|
|
|
|
![]()
|
GOLD & OIL
by Eric Hommelberg Sure, Alan Greenspan comes to the rescue every now and then to assure us that high oil prices are just temporary, but unfortunately his statements contradict those of many industry experts such as Matthew Simmons, Colin Campbell and Kenneth Deffeyes who all claim that we're approaching PEAK-OIL at an alarmingly high speed. It could be very well the case that PEAK-OIL is here right now but unfortunately we've to wait a few years in order to confirm. This chapter discusses PEAK-OIL and why it is about to bring a nasty oil shock coming years. As we will see, previous oil shocks were a perfect call for higher inflation figures and recession. Will this time be any different ? According to Alan Greenspan yes, he says that higher oil prices won’t be much of a problem for the economy these days and inflation won’t pop up as during the seventies. Well, energy experts such as Mathew Simmons and Colin Campbell do think otherwise. They make a powerful case for the end of cheap energy . The nasty consequence of a lack of cheap energy is the end of economic growth. Will we ever come out of a recession again for a sustained period of time ? Richard Heinberg author of “The Party is over – Oil, War and the Fate of Industrial Societies” doesn’t think so. Matthew Simmons (energy advisor for Dick Cheney) just uses different words, he says :
Simmons rules out the possibility of cheap energy coming decades. When asked if there is a solution to the impending energy crisis he said :
Professor Kenneth Deffeyes (author from the Book Beyond Oil-the View from Hubbert's PEAK) has some unpleasant news for us as well. He says :
No standard News indeed ! What is going on you wonder ? They're just a bunch of Alarmist speaking right ? Otherwise politicians and News directors would have picked it up long time ago right ? So no need to worry, all is well as Greenspan says right ? Well, lots of questions which deserves serious attention. Time for further investigation : Let’s focus on the following issues :
1 - Previous Oil shocks and their consequences. Stephen Leeb (president of Leeb Capital Management and editor of the prestigious newsletter ‘The Complete Investor’) wrote an excellent book last year called ‘ The Oil Factor – Protect Yourself (AND PROFIT) from the coming Energy Crisis’. In this book he explains how to use the Oil indicator in order to predict upcoming stock bear markets and economic recessions. In an interview with Jim Puplava on the Financial Sense Newshour Stephen Leeb says :
So any sudden increase in the price of Oil should be something to fear or at least pay serious attention to it. Furthermore Stephen Leeb warns for the rapid rise in the price of Oil in the face of a less rapid growing demand. He says :
It tells you that the world has changed. Stephen Leeb sounds serious, maybe even a bit alarming. What consequences Stephen Leeb expects from rapid rising Oil prices ? Stephen Leeb says :
Higher
Oil prices leading to higher inflation is well illustrated in the chart
below :
Stephen Leeb says :
Stephen Leep’s Oil indicator has worked remarkably well over the last 30 years. If this Oil indicator is going to perform as well in the future as it did before than investors should be on high alert for possible nasty future economic events and be prepared to take appropriate measures in order to protect themselves financially.
So why to buy Gold when
Oil prices are rising rapidly ?
Gold as an Inflation Hedge Gold is being considered as the ultimate Inflation Hedge. The most obvious example is of course the 70’s whereby Gold really took off when inflation kicked in.
In 1977 when inflation
began to pick up steam it reached 9% by 1978. Gold followed by breaking its
previous high of $200. When Inflation hit 10% in 1979, Gold really took off
skyrocketing to $500. Excitement kicked in and a Gold rush mania
launched the yellow metal to its all time high of $850 in 1980, see chart
below :
In times of Inflation you are losing money by holding paper money. A flight from paper money into real money (Gold) is just a logical result.
The Gold/Oil ratio says Gold is a screaming Buy. Over the last 30 years Gold has been trading at an average of 16-17 barrels of Oil per ounce of Gold. At the moment Gold is dirt cheap compared to Oil and trades for about 9 barrels of Oil for an ounce of Gold. Such extremes won’t last for a long period of time so what gives, lower Oil prices down the road or Gold catching up ? According to Matthew Simmons we shouldn’t count on cheap Oil anymore coming decades. Let’s repeat once more what he said when asked if there is a solution to the impending energy crisis he said :
So with
these kind of statements in mind, would you bet on lower Oil prices or
higher Gold prices ? (see chart below)
OK, fine you’ll say, higher Oil prices should make a case for Gold indeed but how serious are those people screaming about the end of cheap Oil ? Should we take their claims seriously ? Why hasn’t the mainstream media hardly picked upon it ? Why didn’t we hear anything about it from politicians lately ? I’ve heard that at least for the next 30 years there should be plenty of Oil, what about that ? Well, many questions which deserves serious attention.
Alarmist preaching a peak in oil production within a few years are referring to studies by Shell geophysicist Dr. Marion King Hubbert. Hubbert predicted already in 1956 that US domestic Oil production would peak around 1970. Unfortunately Hubbert wasn’t taken seriously at all. But what happened ? US Oil production indeed peaked in 1970 as predicted by Hubbert but still it took many years before geologists were willing to admit that Hubbert was right and that US Oil production indeed had peeked in 1970. So based on what theory Hubbert made his predictions and how reliable is this theory in order to predict a future peak in world wide oil production ? It goes far beyond the scope of this article in order to explain the scientific background of PEAK-OIL (Hubbert’s Peak) , it’ll just focus on its conclusions backed up with data available for the last 100 years. Hubbert says more or less that oil discoveries and oil production do follow a so called Bell Curve. The production curve follows the discovery curve with a 40 year delay. Prof. Kenneth Deffeyes who wrote the book ‘Hubbert’s Peak – The Impending World on Shortage’ explains in detail the scientific background of Hubbert’s theory. But let’s focus on just two important issues here :
OK, but what does actual data regarding oil discoveries and oil production tell us so far ? Could Hubbert be right ? Dr. Colin Campbell is most probably the dean among Hubbert’s followers. He worked for Texaco and Amoco as an exploration geologist working in countries as Borneo, Trinidad, Colombia, Australia, Papua New Guinea, the US, Ecuador, the UK, Ireland and Norway. Later on he was associated with Petroconsultants in Geneva, Switserland and brought about the creation of the Association for the Study of Peak Oil (ASPO). Dr. Campbell did a tremendous amount of research regarding Peak-Oil and published his findings in his book ‘The Coming Oil Crisis’. His findings indeed confirmed what Hubbert predicted so many years ago.
Let’s focus first on
data available regarding world wide Oil discoveries. We’ll see that the peak
of Oil discoveries already occurred in the 60’s, see chart below :
Now please digest this carefully. If Hubbert is right then the world Oil production should peak somewhere during this decade (40 years after discovery peak). But the problem is that you can’t say with certainty that Oil production indeed has peaked until several years after the fact. So the only thing we can do is to analyze the production curves of oil producing countries which had a discovery peak way earlier than the 60’s. A good example is the US which saw it’s discovery rate peaking during the early 30’s. Hubbert concluded that the US therefore should experience a peak in Oil production somewhere during the early seventies. At the time Hubbert made that prediction in 1956 he was ridiculed by Oil experts and economists, but nevertheless Hubbert’s prediction came true in 1970, see chart below :
So the US Oil production peeked in 1970 indeed and declined ever since then just as Hubbert predicted. When examining the production curves of all Non-Opec countries combined we’ll see a production curve which matches the predicted Bell Curve almost 100%. See chart below.
So what do we see so far :
What does it tell us ? It tells us that the world oil production still hasn’t peeked because OPEC Oil production still hasn’t peaked. So in order to make predictions about world peak production one should focus on the main OPEC producers. So when will OPEC peak ? According to Bush energy advisor Matthew Simmons OPEC will peak when Saudi Arabia peaks. So what about Saudi Arabia ? When will Saudi Arabia peak ? Matthew Simmons says :
But the problem is that Ghawar is aging rapidly. It’s one of the oldest Oil fields in production and lots of water injection is needed in order to keep production going. At one moment more water injection won’t be able to keep production going and Oil production will fall off a cliff meaning the Oil field dies.. According to Matthew Simmons, the end for Ghawar must be near. It goes far beyond the scope of this article to specify why Matthew Simmons does think so but interested readers can study Simmons findings themselves at : Matthew Simmons : Saudi Arabian Oil – A Glass Half Full Or Half Empty http://www.simmonsco-intl.com/files/Hudson%20Institute.pdf In February this year Matthew Simmons came out with his strongest warning yet :
Expert
says Saudi oil may have peaked
So Mr. Simmons tells us that if Gharwar peaks the whole world peaks. With that in mind this next statement from the Bank of Montreal won't make you feel much happier either :
Bank says Saudi's top
field in decline
The Bank of Montreal is not an exception, French Investment Bank Ixis-CIB isn't too optimistic either on future Oil prices : Will oil strike $380 a barrel by 2015 ? By Adam Porter in Perpignan, France April 21, 2005
You would probably wonder that if this situation is so dire indeed why politicians and or news directors don't seem to bother. Prof. Kenneth Deffeyes says :
But hey, still there're brave congress man who aren't afraid to pick up the issue and to raise serious questions. Congressman Roscoe Bartlett, Chairman of the Projection Forces Subcommittee of the Armed Services Committee, gave an hour long presentation on Peak Oil to the US Congress on Monday March 14 :
Peak Oil Presentation
in the US Congress
So with the peak of world Oil production in sight, what kind of production curve could we expect for total World Oil production ? Dr. Colin Campbell calculates the following production curves :
Any case whether it’s the high case, base case or low case, what should be obvious is that the end of World Oil production increase is near. A World which requires ever increasing amounts of energy (eg China, India, increasing world population etc…) and facing a limit in increasing Oil production simply has to face an increase in Oil prices. It simple as that. Demand outstrips supply by a great margin coming years. Yes, people arguing that there is still Oil left for 30 years, they are right. The Earth contained approximately 2 trillion barrels of Oil. We just consumed 1 trillion barrels of Oil by now so still 1 trillion barrels of Oil to go. With current demand of 80 million barrels a day it’s easy to see why people come up with an estimate of another 30 years of Oil supply. Again, it’s not the problem of No Oil, but it’s the End of Cheap Oil what causes economic turbulence. Matthew Simmons says that Oil prices exceeding $100 / barrel is unavoidable and that should be a wake up call for all investors out there because the end of cheap energy could lead to an unwelcome economic slowdown.
Historical average of the Gold/Oil ratio suggests a price of Gold exceeding $800 nowadays. Please think about that ! An Update on this GOLD & OIL chapter (August 18, 2005) can be found here |
||||||||||||
|
- END -
|
|||||||||||||